Something is stirring....

O.K. - so here I am at Hardee's (Carl's Jr.'s cousin for those of you on the Left-coast). And though they are making some of those wonderful hand-scooped shakes in the background - that's not what is currently stirring.
Lemme 'splain.

I'm here having lunch with my trusty new Notebook computer open, and I just finished a homework assignment for one of my MBA classes. The other assignment I wanted to work on requires me to watch a Youtube video which their network won't allow me to access (probably wise on their part to restrict certain things in this VERY public location).

The point is - I feel something stirring within me, as if God is preparing me for new and exciting things. I still can't quite explain why I'm back in school - studying BUSINESS of all things. But, though I see through a glass, darkly, I believe things will get clearer as we get closer to our goal. As I've written before, in these posts and elsewhere, I still can't explain why we don't "belong" in vocational ministry somewhere - but I know that we just aren't supposed to be there right now. So what is a fellow with a B.A. in Biblial Languages supposed to do to feed his family? Should I stand on the corner wearing a sign that says, "Will parse Greek verbs for food" - ????? Nope.

The fact is, I work in an office setting. The stranger fact is, I'm good at it! How could that be - especially in light of the fact that I truly belive that I am called to the ministry? Well - for starters, I know that God has a plan for me, for us, for my family. He hasn't left us high and dry yet, and I know that He won't - despite my failures and my profound ability to make masses of things. The second thing is, I always have to remember to ask - what does "the ministry" look like? I love people - that's a topic for another day I s'pose. Ministry, of course doesn't involve working at a church or "christian" organization. However, I do feel ultimately called to that sort of thing - but perhaps in a different context. It's all quite fuzzy still. But I believe that in the near future, full-time vocational ministry will be the "exception" but not the rule- particularly in the U.S. This goes to my belief about the church in North America - get ready for some toe-stepping folks. Two things:

First, I really, truly believe that the church is in transition. Basically, I think we're really good at having meetings - but we're notso great at meeting people where they are "at" (bad grammar alert). I was excited to talk to a dear friend (and my former pastor) regarding their church's transition from the "traditional" model of having lots of meetings, to a small-group structure that seems to be taking root. Again - this obviates the point that by and large, the church is in transition - from having meetings, to reaching people where they live. Don't get me wrong - there's still a need for corporate worship - but by and large, the people aren't coming in droves just to attend one of our "meetings" - which are generally designed "by us, for us" - those of us who are already "In" so to speak.

Secondly, I firmly believe that churches who don't face the facts and do something to change in this regard are going to become irrelevant - soon, if they aren't already. (Ouch!) How can you say that, Steve? Well - look around! Are we reaching the next generation? Not only are they not even coming through the door, but what if our ultimate goal is to actually disciple people? In most cases (not all, but most) - our goal has been to somehow get them through the door, and down front mumbling "the prayer" at one of our "meetings." But, what if the goal is to help them become Jesus-like? Are we doing the job? Are we anywhere close? With little exception - in my opinion, nope.

But we do have some really great meetings,... don't we?

I'll probably regret posting this later.

Just a bit of random, randomness....

Sooo, in church we're talking about leaving a legacy for our family - namely the next generation. I once mused about writing our epitaph and what it is I want to be remembered for. As I think about these things again, I've come to realize that what I really want in life, at least at this stage, is to not miss any of it - particularly with my wife Beth, and my sons. I want them to say that I was "there".

Sure, I want my epitaph to read that people saw Jesus in me, that I was genuine, giving, etc..... But these days, more than that, I want my legacy to live on in relationships, not necessarily in monuments or even accomplishments.

Don't get me wrong, I still have a drive to achieve -I mentioned the other day that I am now working on an MBA - and loving it! I want to invest more. (Gosh, the markets are down right now, wish I could buy more while stocks are still cheap!), I want to pay off my mortgage and leave an inheritance for my children's children like it says in Proverbs.

But in the long run none of that stuff matters - its just stuff. I don't want to lose out on the here and now while I am still here - and now, by being too busy accomplishing all of those accomplishments I am so driven to accomplish! So sorry to ramble.

Did I mention that next Friday (2/13) will be my 40th? Perhaps that's why I'm rambling about life and accomplishments..... sigh.

'Tis the season...

I LOVE Christmas! I Love everything about it. I love the chilly weather, wearing sweaters, Christmas cards, Christmas plays, Christmas carols on the radio and in the background at stores. I love Bell-ringers, decorating the tree and of course the food. I love Santa Claus, and Reindeer. I love the Nativity.

What's that? I Love Santa? You Betcha! I've got no problem with the Big guy. I BELIEVE in Santa. I've written about it here before. (In contrast to my hatred of the Easter Bunny!)

Fact is, he's somewhat (if not loosely) based on a real historical figure - Nicolas of Myra. (There's a lot of fanciful stuff related to the legend & supposed posthumous miracles, etc..., but I believe the gift-giving part rings true.)

You see, as we remember the True meaning of Christmas - that God became flesh and dwelt among us in the person of Jesus, I believe that all the trappings of the season just help to make it that much more wonderful and special. Without the incarnation there could have been no sacrifice of atonement for our sins.

But as I've said it before (I'll say it again), we are not commanded in scripture to remember Jesus' birth, but rather his death, burial and resurrection through communion. In the same way though, we should never forget the wonderful miracle of Christmas or let it be overshadowed by commercialism. I would never advocate going overboard with Santa (to the point of lying to your kids) and going into debt as so many folks do this time of year - that's just silly.

What I do recommend though is to ENJOY the season! Make Merry! Spend time with your family! Why not bake some cookies, give small gifts to your neighbors, send cards, go to a few of the parties you get invited to every year. Go to the school or church play, sing in the choir, put money in the bell-ringer's kettle - decorate the tree! This is a wonderful season - a time to remember that our Lord gave us a great gift for the salvation of mankind - He gave Himself! We have such a wonderful opportunity at this time of the year to pry the doors of people's hearts open just a little more - or as one friend and mentor of mine put it, to welcome them home.

And for heaven's sake - don't be afraid to say, "Merry Christmas!" when you see people out in public. There's a lot that has been said on this subject but I believe a VAST Majority of us are more offended when people DON'T say Merry Christmas, but water it down with "Happy Holidays!" instead.

Why not just go all the way then?

Thoughts on the dangers of having influence...

Soo, here we go again...

I did a little post two days ago and Jason (one of my two faithful readers, but one of the only ones who actually leave a comment) reminded me about my old Fender acoustic. This got me to thinking a bit -then my mind wandered completely. I hearkened back to my days as a young youth pastor, and then back to my days as a young yout' - not-so many years, but several pounds and hairstyles ago...
(Cue dreamy harp music)

What struck me, is how I am still in awe of, and profoundly influenced by my old youth ministers from that day (One died and 2 others are "out of the ministry" - one is a school principal I think). I learned a lot about leadership, leading worship, setting goals, dealing with conflict and even "dreaming big" from one guy in particular I lost touch with several years ago. (Scott - wherever you are - I miss you, man - you meant a lot to me.) The reality is, I look an aweful lot like the people who influenced me early on.
(Fade to black)

As I was thinking, I remembered an event that happened about 11 Summers ago.
(Fade in to a panning shot of cornfields on a hot sunny day)

I had the surprise of my life one day in July, 1996 while I was standing under a tent in McComb, Il (at the Cornerstone festival) and Jason (yes, my "buddy" who leaves me snyde comments on this here blog thingy) showed up out of the clear blue. We got to hang out that week at C-stone and he was one of a handful of people who actually caught our show. Since he was camping I brought him back to my motel room so he could shower and he let me fiddle around on his guitar. He then made a comment I'll never forget. He said that all the years he had been playing he didn't realize how much he sounded like me on the guitar. In a sense, he didn't realize that I had been a musical influence on him. This of course blew me away, shocked and humbled me and I hesitate to share it now except to say that it stands to reason - the more we hang out with somebody, the more alike we become. (Can anyone here say the word "DISCIPLESHIP" ??????) I think that is the whole point.
(Fast forward to present day)

Though it is something I have known all along, now more than ever, I am humbled and just a little bit scared that I can have a powerful influence on the people that I am around. I have heard it said that our strengths are passed on to those we mentor, but our weaknesses at times are MAGNIFIED..... that is a scary thought. This means that my cynical, critical attitude - my know-it-all, agrumentative, opinionated, judgementalism - could not only be passed on, but magnified (if this is true...) in those I lead and mentor - and especially in my own kids!

I hope people catch the good stuff. I wish that I could say, as Paul did: "Follow me as I follow Christ..." but I can't always say that. I am pretty messed up at times.

I have a friend and mentor named Dan. Dan was one of my college professors, a pastor/teacher-type guy who was very down to earth. He even spent a few years recently as the college President. He made a little plaque - one of those shiny brass thingy's you get at a trophy shop, engraved with a saying that has stuck with me through the years and has really influenced me in ministry and life in general. He attaches this plaque on his pulpit wherever he goes. It reads:

"What on earth are you doing to these people...?"

I think that just about sums it up.
(Fade out...roll credits...)

Thoughts on my lack of discipline...

Soo,

Why is it that we humans have a propensity for making outrageous commitments with regards to self-improvement, weight-loss, our prayer-life, yard work, etc....... only to completely BLOW IT just a few short days (weeks) later?

Just askin'......

Toe-stepping time!

O.K., here goes.

I am still formulating my belief's and opinions on this topic and I hope this will start some meaningful discussion. Let me start with a little background - on myself, just to let you know where I am coming from so that I won't be accused of either being defensive or biased (which we all are to a degree if we'll just admit it!)

I grew up in a ministry family - my mom was a full-time, licensed C.E./Children's pastor, my uncle served on the mission field in Central America, I spent a great deal of time during my adolescence doing ministry with outreach teams in Mexico (all over Mexico!). I went from High School to Bible College where I majored in Biblical Languages, then I went to Fuller Seminary (I lack 5 classes for my Master's. My whole goal in life has always been ministry - pastoring, church staff ministry, and Teaching at a Bible College or institute.

I have been leading worship and teaching since I was in high school. My first real foray into ministry was leading worship and being on the "team" for a successful church planting venture while I was still a senior in High School. I had a great mentor. I then spent several years in full-time ministry as a youth pastor, then bi-vocational ministry while at Seminary. Our family then moved and we pastored for a couple of years (it was disastrous!). After that we served on staff again for a year or so - then we were dumped! (I won't give any details - but let's just say I wasn't the first and certainly not the last casualty under that particular ministry/senior pastor).

Soo, I now find myself in the Mid-West rethinking the whole role of the institutional church and where I fit in as a servant to the body of Christ.

I am not responding to any particular post, book or blogsite, but rather to my personal sense that the pendulum shouldn't swing too far in the direction that it is currently headed. Let me just say that I could fill several lines with links to references from just a handful of bloggers, book reviews and articles to prove my point. Here I choose not to make it personal against any particular author or post, just suffice it to say, I am not angry about anything, nor am I offended - I am just concerned. Also, my opinions and observations are not directed toward any specific church or pastor - My former church (JAG) is a GREAT church, with a GREAT PASTOR! I now attend another great church with a great pastoral team and awesome ministries for the whole family. That being said, here goes.

My first point (yes, that was a long intro.....):

The institutional church is definitely in trouble.

There are scores of books and bloggers out there currently spelling this out. Some of them are helpful at pointing out areas where we are missing the point and not connecting with our culture - I agree. Some are merely critical and don't offer any real solutions - in fact the perception I get is that many of the authors themselves have all but given up on the church as it stands today. I believe that this is a mistake.

The Church HAS been (slowly) Responding

There are many different formats and forums where "the church" can flourish - house churches for one. In our society there is a growing need for people to connect in a meaningful way. As an aside, one thing that drew our family to LARGER churches in the past was our need to feel "safe" and insulated from people because we were wounded in ministry. (This was both wrong and a temporary solution to a very real problem we had to work out in ourselves.)

In my experience there is also something very meaningful about coming together as a larger representation of the body of Christ and gathering in celebration. That could explain why there are so many regional conferences popping up where smaller churches (and home-based fellowships) can come and worship collectively. There truly is something special that happens as we identify with the body of Christ at large.
My main point is that while we are in a state of flux, there are and will continue to be "successful" ministries across the spectrum. The whole goal should be to fulfill the Lord's commission to make disciples. There are people who get plugged-in through traditional ministries as well as through non-traditional formats. I believe it is a shame to completely discount the "traditional, institutional church" as totally irrelevant. True, there are many (like myself) who are screaming for reform from within the old structure. I believe we can find success - it is a worthy endeavor. Two of my heroes were just such figures - Erasmus, and Sir Thomas Moore. They were both contemporaries of, and mostly in agreement with many of Martin Luther's criticisms of the catholic Church of his day. But, they sought to reform the church from the inside-out (which would have saved much bloodshed). History tells us that they were successful to a degree - as was Luther - only many years later.

This new state of flux and need for reform we are currently experiencing shouldn't require bloodshed. (Although I have witnessed a few lively church-council meetings in my day). In a nutshell, there seems to be a bit of pride getting in the way between churches who have buildings vs' churches who choose not to have buildings. Also, (and to a lesser degree) churches with professional clergy vs' those whithout. There are arguments for and against both models.

Frankly, I am on neither side. I rejoice when I hear that one of the churches in town is growing to the point where they need more space. There is a limit to how many services you can hold in a given weekend - especially if you rely heavily on volunteers. I also relate to the church who chooses to meet on a Saturday evening at the park, play volleyball, cook bratz and sing together accompanied by acoustic guitars - awesome stuff! My beef is that there isn't a RIGHT way, or WRONG way to do church, as long as we are being obedient to what the Lord has called us to be and we aren't doing it out of rebellion or pride.

Any thoughts?

Still more thoughts on evangelism...

Here is the second installment on the topic of evangelism.

Let me repeat what I said a few days ago and say that I believe in evangelism wholeheartedly, in salvation by grace through faith, and that we each have a responsibility to fulfill the great commission. I just have a problem with some of our methods, goals, and various expectations with regards to "winning souls."

To put it plainly, we inadvertently end up hurting the cause more than helping it. We are very good at being irrelevant in the name of Christianity. (My friend Jason has a lot to say on the subject here for just one example.) But aside from that, the environment has changed quite a lot during this past few years. The truth of the gospel will always be relevent - only Jesus can set us free from the bondage of sin and death. In general though, our society is less open to the message.

For one thing, the idea of "sin" is a foreign concept to many people on the street. We christians have successfully branded ourselves as the "can't do" crowd. Try this one on the average christian you may run into - ask them to define "sin" and then listen to them. Chances are you will get a list of "bad" behaviors we as "christians" aren't "allowed" to engage in. Go ahead - I dare you! What are we modeling to the world out there? Is this freedom from sin?

On the contrary, victory over sin should mean that theres a whole lot of things out there that just don't satisfy the longing in my heart - I know, cause now I'm not empty any more.

But, back to the point - sin no longer exists in our society as far as the average person is concerned. We do what we feel like as long as nobody gets hurt (and if they do, hey that's the way it goes.) So, if there is no sin, why do we need a savior? Salvation - from what? And don't even talk about a literal heaven or hell!

Maybe what I'm ranting about here is the fact that we have allowed the media and our politicians to define christianity for our society. They have managed to turn us into nothing more than another "voting block" or subculture. We just need to be acknowledged and satisfied come the nearest election cycle. We'll shut up and play nice as long as somebody throws us a bone once in awhile. (Hows that for a few mixed metaphors! This blogging stuff is real hard - it's almost like rocket surgery...) Once the news cycle is over, we again become irrelevant.

How are we viewed by society at large? What do they see in us? Are we angry like Fred Phelps? Perhaps they see the glitz and glamour of the TV evangelists, or the gaudiness of the Prosperity Gospel megaghurches. Do we christians appear to be naieve and sheltered like Ned Flanders? Maybe we're hypocrites in their eyes and they view us in the same vein as Ted Haggard or the late Tammy Faye?

While I don't wish to validate these stereotypes, wouldn't you agree that we have done our part to perpetuate these classic misconceptions?

So what does this have to do with evangelism? I'm so glad you asked. The point is that WE (and our methods) need to adapt to this phenomenon. For the most part, people out there want to at least appear to be "open-minded" - in fact they consider us to be exclusive, intolerant and "closed-minded". What people are looking for (believe me - they are looking for something) - what people are Screaming for - is community! We want to belong. We crave relationships. We long for authentic friendships.

This is in stark contrast to how we often treat people we are "witnessing" to. We can't treat our "friends" as nothing more than conversion "prospects." I have met many people who have expressed that they felt a christian had befriended them just to get them to join their church, or come to a play or some other "evangelistic" event. How would you feel if you knew that your new friend wasn't really interested in you as a friend - but a number, or a "scalp?" But the organized church has encouraged this sort of befriending by running campaigns, crusades and contests - I've taken part in it myself in days past.

I do believe we have the answer to makind's delimma. The world is dying of thirst, and we have the water (wasn't that a bit cliche) - but it's true! We just spend too much time trying to make the water more palatable. (It doesn't need it!) We repackage it, buff it, shine it and have contests to see how many people want it - without really giving it to them. That's my beef. More to come - I promise.

Thoughts on Evangelism...sort of...er, I guess...

This is the first in what will I am sure become a controversial topic on my otherwise bland blogspace. I blame this entry on the fact that it is currently too bloody cold to give you one of my usual manly fishing reports. Here goes – you’ve been forewarned.

I have never been one to stand on a street corner, or even openly “witness” as many other “Evangelists” I know do routinely. I wholeheartedly subscribe that it is our duty as Christ’s followers to fulfill the great commission and make disciples. However, I don’t always agree with current methodology, or many of the current measures of “success” that we evangelicals have put forth. At the risk of sounding downright cynical, (or liberal), I think we have really missed the point.

The apostle Paul certainly “persuaded” many (though usually in the context of a public forum) and none would argue that he achieved what we would consider “enviable results.” When he was intentionally un-persuasive, God confirmed his message through signs and wonders (c.f. 1 Cor.) However, I seriously doubt that the author of the very “Roman” road that we are taught in our evangelism 101 classes ever resorted to such canned methods. So what is the point? (I thought you’d never ask!)

Lately I have found myself questioning “our” (I mean the conservative evangelical community that we narrowly call the “church”) – I’ve been questioning “our”, definition of being “saved”, “getting saved” and the notion of the “salvation” experience as we currently accept it.

Before you freak out let me assure you that I am a firm believer in true, instantaneous “conversion” – salvation, by grace, through faith- I am in EVERY way an orthodox, evangelical Christian. However, I believe that our methods often fall short of this true conversion in my opinion.

We can all site myriad examples of people who “witness” 24-7, 365 and are very confrontational everywhere they go. While at the grocery check-out they ask – “have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal savior?” Now, don’t get me wrong – I have always admired those who are so bold – but I don’t often see the fruit. On the contrary, in my journeys I have often (too many times to count!) had to clean up after these proverbial ‘bulls’ in the china shop. I have also witnessed what I would call “true” conversion during such clean-up efforts because I took the time to be real with folks.

My beef with the whole process is in how we define success. Too often while “witnessing” or “soul-winning” (my favorite term to make fun of) the goal is to simply win an argument – an unsolicited argument at that, on the part of the intended “soul” being “won”. If the argument is “won” and the soul in question assents, then you get to pray, the “sinners” prayer and “viola” - success, you now have a baby Christian on your hands. On to the next victim.

In church settings the goal is to get ‘em down front. That is “success” in our world. The question then is, How shall we then live? Isn’t there more to this life than praying the sinners’ prayer or going down front?

There will be more on this subject soon – if you don’t all string me up first. Bye for now…

I hope next time to define what success ought to be - here's a hint - there's something called "community" involved.

Could you please pass me the reality...and a grain of salt...

As if anybody cares what I think....here goes.

I enjoy going online as much as the next guy. That being said, could somebody please tell me what the heck is happening to our society? We are becoming increasingly isolated and have substituted real, meaningful relationships for our online persona's. (See here for more of my take on this subject.)
Also, with regard to politics, we have all witnessed how the Internet has become overladen with rumors, distortions and outright lies. I for one believe in putting the power into the hands of the people, and in no way would I ever be a proponent of censorship. However, it's just gotten ridiculous lately. Who can we trust? Are there any truly unbiased sources for news anymore? It seems that everybody has a horse in this race. Also see here - for a better example of what happenned to them (Carville, Begala & Zimmerman at CNN).
A good friend of mine has a classic comeback when discussing politics. When asked if he is a Democrat or Republican his reply is simply, "I'm an agnostic."

My take on this whole thing is that we want to hear what we want to hear, and naturally gravitate towards those who share our viewpoint. That being said though, I will admit that I am as biased as the next guy. But, I am getting sick of being told what to believe - politically and otherwise. Isn't it the goal of education, (and the aim of free speech) to give us the tools to make well-informed decisions about those things that most affect our lives?
The end result, (in my opinion) is that we have been conditioned to question EVERYTHING and trust nobody! While this is healthy, especially given the current political and epistemological climate, (such big words) we seem to have all become so cynical and jaded lately that it's just depressing! Chalk it up to the effects of postmodernism, or whatever you want to call it - I don't like it. Maybe I'm just naive, but I have become increasingly nostalgic for those simple days when things were black and white. At least we had a common enemy, and we knew (at least we thought we knew) who the bad guys were - they wore black hats!

Random musings on the state of our society, and other stuff....

This one has been cooking for awhile, so look out!

The other night (a couple of weeks ago, during my latest spree of self-inflicted, painful busyness) me and Beth were sitting back musing. Let me 'splain. Some people "chat", others "share" - not us, we "muse" about stuff. This particular evening our musings took on the usual philosophical tone and I had a (rare) moment of lucidity. Bingo! By way of background, may I add that I am little more than a casual observer of human behavior - most things take me by complete surprise - however, lately I have been frustrated with the state of the world in general. The main case in point - it is no longer right to be right. That was the brilliant thought about which we mused that evening. In our world today - you can no longer be "right" about anything. Everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) is subjective.

This leads me to think... is it o.k. to be wrong? It must be. If I am wrong, you don't dare tell me I'm wrong - you don't have the right to do so. (So long as there is no current law against what I am "wrong" about).



This led to an even further digression. If (big If) there is no moral standard - no definite "right" any more (I disagree), then we (subjectively) can determine our own path and our own moral standards. This is exactly where we are in society - those in the know call it "Post-modernism" - which is arguably very difficult to clearly define. (If you are still with me, I'll be shocked).
The larger topic of moral absolutes (and their basic proofs) is deep fodder wich I will probably never ever get to and if I should, it will be on my other blog - http://theologylite.blogspot.com/
The sign of our times is currently a guy (or gal) with their hands out in a "back-off" gesture - as if to say, "Hey, stay out of my space." We often hear the phrase - "If it works for you, great!" and "Whatever gets you through the day." Many of my friends now refuse to discuss "religion & politics" in mixed company for fear of being labeled "intolerant" or worse yet "closed-minded."


This is where things get interesting. If it is "wrong" to be "right" about something - or if believing that you are in fact "right" about something - specifically your core moral beliefs - your faith for instance - you believe deep in your soul that this is the truth - if being "right" makes you "wrong" because other people disagree, isn't it "wrong" for them to tell you that you are "wrong" for believing that you are "right" about your beliefs??????? Aren't they being equally closed-minded? That would be wrong wouldn't it?

Well, you don't dare tell them that they are "wrong" to say that you are "wrong" for believing you are "right" - that would be "wrong!"

What is your word?

Our church has been going through a re-evaluation process this past few months. It is truly exciting - I am hopeful of the outcome. We are on the path to good health! Part of this process has been to examine our core values as a church body. One question that we have asked ourselves is: What one word would describe our church? What do people say about your church in one word.

This got me thinking: Hmmmmmm.

Let's get personal with that. If I were to ask that question about myself what would it be? If I were to ask another person what comes to mind when you think about "Steve Oberg" what would that one word be? Quite candidly - I've got a few:

Chubby, Opinionated, "Consitently Inconsistant", Apathetic, Irreverent, procrastinating, cynical, self-serving, lazy, under-achiever...blah,blah,blah...

You get the idea. No, I'm not picking on myself - this is healthy self-examination. (sort of)

Truthfully, what would your list of possible one-word descriptors look like? Does your day-to-day behavior match up with your stated beliefs? Are there areas in your life where you need pruning so that you can grow more healthy? Do you ever think about it? Yes, it can be painful to be so honest, but many people just go through life day to day without ever thinking about who they really are or what they would like to become. Soooo, take some time and think about it for just one minute. What is your word? Really.

The truth is, this side of heaven there will always be a disconnect between how we would like to see ourselves and day-to-day reality. No, we aren't always at our worst, but for me at least - I am closer to my worst than my best most of the time. I'm a sinner. I'm in process. We all are. God isn't finished with us yet. I'm thankful every day for His grace and forgiveness.

As for my personal disconnect, I know what I would like to hear people say about me:

Faithful, Honest, Hard-working, Loyal, Integrous, Talented, Humorous, Thoughtful, Bold...

How about you? What is your word? (For yourself) What would you like for me to say about you in just one word.

Think about it. Be honest. It's good for you.

Stuff I'd rather not comment on...

Here's a list of news stories I just don't know how to respond to.
(In other words: I'm sick of hearing about them and the spin that goes along with them.)

I will now take a couple of minutes and give my brief, crass (& in most cases uninformed) opinion of them.

Anna Nicole Smith - My final opinion: Who cares?! Tragic? Yes. Feel sorry for the kid.

The Alberto Gonzales hearing - My opinion: Huh?

Here's my opinion based on what little I know about it. All we have is hearsay from the accusers. Most people don't know enough or haven't paid attention enough (myself included) to care. In my opinion, this doesn't look like revenge on political enemies, but if so, so what? Like it didn't happen in other administrations? I know that wouldn't make it right - but to me it seems like they are just trying to play "gotchya" again. (Remember Scooter Libby?)

Imus Get's Canned - As I see it: Dunno, don't care!

Actually, my biggest concern with this one is that he got lumped in with "conservative" talk show hosts who supposedly say racist, bigoted, sexist things all the time and seemingly get away with it. (huh?) I do listen to "conservative" talk radio occasionally and haven't heard anything like what Imus said - even in jest! As for Imus - I don't think he'll be missed.

The Virginia Tech Shooting - This was a nightmare!!!

However, now the way the media is playing it, we're somehow supposed to feel sorry for this clown because of his isolated upbringing. And, of course this tragedy is being used (by the left) as another case for gun control. Leave it alone whydontchya! If a bad guy wants to get a gun - he's going to get a gun! If this clown hadn't gotten his gun legally - he would have gotten it illegally. I could easily walk out my door right now, go about 5 blocks and procure a weapon within a couple of hours, just by asking a few people. I know this for a fact. When I lived in Pasadena, I was offered all kinds of unbelievable stuff at least on a weekly basis. What good will it do to pass more laws? At the end of the day, we'll feel better about ourselves I guess.

That's all I've got to say about that.

Easter Bunny Stew for Everyone!!!

Lately for some reason I've really had a problem with the Easter Bunny. Let me explain. No, he hasn't been picking on me or anything - I hear he's quite tame actually.

But, it just frosts me that all the attention is on this little (probably German) egg-laying rabbit instead of on the real reason for this celebration - the RESURRECTION of Jesus.



Let me go on record here. I have no real problem with Santa Claus - but I've got a big problem with the Bunny. (Not the chocolate ones however - those I like!)



Here's the thing - in scripture we are never told to remember the birth of Jesus - though were it not for the incarnation, there would be no salvation. So, though Santa Clause can be a distraction, he just doesn't get me the way the Bunny does!

Jesus used a simple object lesson (the bread and the cup / the body and the blood) to illustrate the reality of His death. In the upper room the disciples are told, "...this do in remembrance of me." At Easter we celebrate the Resurrection of Jesus.

As for the origin of the name Easter and the pagan origin and symbolism of the bunny and the coincidence of our Easter celebration with the Spring Equinox see here.



Soo,... Just to show my outright defiance of all this PAGANISM - I thought I'd include a couple of recipes. (WARNING - some of these recipes may contain wine. If you get offended by such things just substitute cooking sherry. Wink wink!)

As for these recipes - this is becoming a new tradition of mine. I AM INDEED making Easter Bunny Stew (got the little sucker marinading even as I type this.) Try one of these recipes for yourself - you'll be glad you did.

Join with me in a little righteous protest my friends! Bon Apetit!

------------------------------------------------------------------

Easter Bunny Stew

1 three pound Easter Bunny

6 small onions, chopped

1 bay leaf

½ cup chopped celery

2 tsp. salt2 cups diced carrots

3 raw potatoes, cut up

3 tbs. flour

1 tbs. chopped parsley

Clean Easter Bunny and soak in salted water.

Drain, disjoint it in pieces for serving and place in a large kettle

with onions, bay leaf, celery and salt.

Cover with cold water and cook slowly until tender, about two hours.

Add chopped carrots and potatoes and continue cooking until these vegetables are done.

Smooth flour with a little cold water and add slowly.

When thickened, add chopped parsley and serve.

---------------------------------------------------------

Easter Bunny On a Stick

marinade4lb deboned Easter Bunny backs and legs cut into small cubes

4tbl spoons olive oil

5cloves garlic minced

2tbl spoons rosemary

3tbl spoons parmesan cheesesalt and pepper

Place Easter Bunny {Peter Cottontail} cubes in combined marinade

and let marinade over night
Place Easter Bunny on skewers {small portions} roll skewers in flour then in egg then in seasoned bread crumbs.
Heat a cast iron frying pan with oil and brown skewers in oil place browned skewers in roasting pan standing vertical and roast at 400 degrees for 40 minutes. Serve with a nice Niagara merlot

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hasenpfeffer - German Easter Bunny

2 1/2 pounds Easter Bunny (up to 3 lb) -- cut up

2 cups dry red wine

2 tablespoons wine vinegar

1 tablespoon sugar

1 tablespoon salt

1 teaspoon whole cloves

1/8 teaspoon pepper

2 bay leaves

Place cut-up Easter Bunny in flat refrigerator container. In bowl, combine remaining ingredients; Pour over Easter Bunny. Marinate overnight in refrigerator. Place marinated Easter Bunny in Crock-Pot. Add 1 1/2 cups marinade. cover and cook on Low for 8 to 10 hours. Remove meat to warm platter. Thicken gravy, if desired. Serves 4

Thoughts on athiests and other unimportant stuff...

When I was a kid (in body and in mind) I enjoyed the occasional indulgence in Mad Magazine - in particular the comic genius of Dave Berg's "The lighter side of.... We even owned a little paperback with a collection of his comics as they appeared from the 60's & early 70's. One of my favorites was of a very dour looking pale thin guy wearing a sandwich sign that read:

"I Swear To God, I'm An Athiest"

We can laugh about this now, especially in the post-modern world in which we live. Today that sign might read:

"I Think I May Be An Agnostic, But I Don't Really Know For Sure"

One of our favorite commedians put it this way - it's no longer in vogue to call yourself an athiest - instead you say, "I'm an agnostic, and you're stupid."

However unpopular, athiests still don't seem to be in such short supply .

In a recent article in Newsweek, Rabbi Marc Gelman (here) comments on a recent debate between Rick Warren (Pastor of Saddleback Community Church) and "Devout Athiest" (my term) Sam Harris on whether we can know that God is real. Dr. Gelman (in addition to being a trained Rabbi he holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy) says that the two are missing the point - that the existance or reality of God is a "Mystery" and is born out in how we live our lives. For him (if I understand the article correctly) not only is this the wrong question, but it is also unanswerable and completely subjective. He goes so far as to wish that Rick Warren could be less exclusive in his belief.

This (to me) is disturbing for at least a couple of reasons.

God's existance is not dependent upon my thoughts or feelings about him. To say that God may be real to one person in such and such a way, and not to another person and that's O.K., is to render God subject to OUR will and whim. If He is God - by nature He stands outside of creation - all of creation must be subject to Him. We seem to have this backwards. He is God whether or not I acknowledge Him.

As well, it would seem for Rabbi Gelman that, since he is so willing to let everyone have their cake and eat it too (just read the article) he may not be among those who would acknowledge the existance of a "real" God. I cannot in fairness speak for him - but his language (and inclusiveness) are strong clues. True, God's essence may be beyond our grasp. However, the question still stands: Does He or does He not exist? This may be a continuation of the previous point - but it bears repeating: He would exist - or not exist apart from my belief, if He is indeed God.

Thirdly - and this is a very common argument (read: worn-out and over-simplified). Can the true athiest even exist? An athiest by definition is one who believes that God does not exist. However, can he "prove" that God does not. He can appeal to nature (natural disasters, etc...). He can appeal to man's nature (his cruelty and such). He can appeal to logic - ("Is there impirical evidence that God does exist?"). These are all examples which would question the existence of a "just" God. True, they are good questions, but can the athiest "Prove" that God does not exist? Can he claim to know everything? He would have to know everything about the entire universe to know that there isn't a God hiding somewhere in some far off corner. Logically then, the athiest cannot honestly claim to know everything - and so, the athiest vanishes forever in a small simple puff of logic.

A "New" Modest Proposal...

Lately, I have found myself getting a little groggy just after lunch. I often sit in my Jeep, chow down and read for awhile (either my Bible or something else I'm working on). Inevitably, my head starts to nod after about 20 minutes. Sometimes I can blame the reading material (Leviticus!), but lately that hasn't been the problem.

Then I got to thinking...Hmmm.....

On my former trips to Mexico - particularly in the larger cities, I remember that just about the whole place shuts down between about 12:30 - 2pm. Our small band of short-term missionaries often took advantage of this phenomenon and found travel easier and lines much shorter at the places we would go sight-seeing. I remember one instance in particular at Chepultepec Castle in Mexico City. It had been very crowded in the Park and our local host said - let's wait a little while, then it will be easy. Sure enough - he was right! Why was everyone gone? Why was it soo deserted? Siesta Time!

Physiologically, it makes sense - we eat a meal (I admit - I usually over-eat), then the blood rushes from our extremities to our stomach to go to work on what we just ate. This causes us to relax a little - and get groggy. I didn't seem to notice it a few years ago, but now that I'm 38 - well, 38 isn't old, but I'm not 20 anymore!

My wife Beth recently read me an excerpt from an article that said in Thailand many employers encourage and allow workers to sleep with their heads on their desks for an hour after lunch. Hmm...
They say it encourages productivity.
Hmmmm....

Maybe we should try to pass a law mandating a siesta in the middle of our work-day! Think about it - perhaps productivity would increase as it appears to have done in Thailand. It could be the answer to the upcoming economic doom-and-gloom everyone is trying to forecast.

BTW: The graphic above was stolen from a website suggesting that very thing (last summer in the U.K. they actually tried it!).

Maybe we could pork-barrel it in with the next version of the war-spending bill to try and buy the hispanic vote...No?

Who's side would God be on?

So, while at work this week I came to the realization that I have a little moral dilemma.

Let me explain. I work for a pest control company. We are very good at what we do.

What do we do? We kill things.
Every winter for the past 75 years my company experiences a seasonal slow time. Every Spring - things pick up. We are waiting for the annual pick-up. In order for our company to be "successful" we hope for the annual pest invasion to occur.
Ants, mice, roaches, termites and other pests are responsible for literally BILLIONS of dollars worth of economic loss every year. We obviously derive an economic benefit from this "loss." Call it a symbiotic relationship.

So, this past week, I have found myself waiting for the phone to ring. I've been hoping more folks will call with ant problems, or mice, maybe a few roaches. Do I dare say...termites? Am I wrong for hoping business might pick up a little - even though it may mean misfortune for others?

It makes me wonder. What does God think of all this.** After all, these are His creatures we are killing. He is really the one who feeds and nurtures them, though we sometimes view them as a nuisance. He can even use them to teach us things - for example in Proverbs 6:6 "Go to the ant, you sluggard! Consider its ways and be wise..."

God can also use such humble little creatures to accomplish even bigger tasks. I remember back in the day when we (our churches) used to sing a song (definitely NOT among my personal favorites) entitled - "Blow the trumpet in Zion." Here are some of the words:

They rush on the city, they ride on the walls,
Great is the army that carries out His word!
Blow the trumpet in Zion! Sound the alarm!

People would get all excited and hyped up. Yeah! The army of the Lord is coming! Yet, when you read Joel chapter 2, the scripture underlying that song you soon find out that the army of the Lord is a locust swarm being prophesied as judgement AGAINST Israel! Now that's exciting, isn't it? God's army - carrying out His word - destroying their livelihood! Praise God!

And so, it causes me to muse - with regards to my current employment, who's side would God be on? I'd vote for the termites.

**Footnote: Seriously, were you really expecting a deep theological argument for this particular subject? C'mone, really? In the future there will surely be some serious discussion - but not today.

In a dry and thirsty land...

We were on a long journey. Many in our party were tired and hungry. But we pressed on. We were on a mission. We had seen some interesting wildlife along the way - many carrion birds, dangerous reptiles, even large primates. Off in the distance we spotted a tiger. It was too far away for now to be any threat to us, and so we pressed on toward a more important and immediate goal. We had to find water, and fast!

Some locals directed us to what had once been a fairly reliable water source - but to no avail. It was dry. Away from the comforts of home we became painfully aware of our plight. We would normally take these most basic things for granted - but not now. The younger ones in our group were in dire straits. They were seriously fatigued, in need of shade, rest and especially water.

Just ahead, up at the crest of a small hill there appeared to be signs of life-giving water. However, it would be costly. I had no idea just how costly until....I read these signs:

$3.00 bottle!!!!! What a rip-off!

The St. Louis Zoo is a very big place. Not a bad deal either. It has free admission - and if you want to pay, there are some neat attractions - a train ride, a prehistoric simulator and lots of other stuff. However, there is one teensy fly in the ointment. They DON'T have any water fountains that work! We looked long and hard most of the day to even find a water fountain. Then, when we found it - it was turned off for the winter! The cycle repeated itself with every fountain we came across.

Water bottles are expensive - like $3- so what is a large group supposed to do? We sent two of our kids to the car of course and carried it in ourselves. Hey, any responsible safari leader would pack water in for his team don't ya think!

Aside from nearly dying of thirst before we got to the gorilla exibit we had a great time!

Here's to political in-correctness & the age of innocence...

In case you haven't yet heard, there is currently a big flap over a recent comment Ann Coulter made during a speach at a big conservative P.A.C. fundraiser. If you haven't heard about it yet, turn on the news or look at MSNBC.com, as well as everywhere else.

Let it be known that I am one for free speech, and I'm also certainly no fan of Sen. Edwards. I personally could care less what she called him. However, I have a few problems with Ms. Coulter's remarks:

• A. Since it has been widely publicized, an ever-increasing segment of the population who normally wouldn't have been in tune to this sort of thing now believe that she is speaking on behalf of ALL us "bigoted" conservatives. (*Please see footnote)


• 2. My in-laws have now joined in on this discussion.


• 2.1 Ann Coulter was being at least dishonest while not really being all that funny (No I don't think Ann Coulter REALLY thinks the Hon. Sen. Edwards is actually fruity.)

My wife an I popped in on her dad earlier this evening just as the news came on that Ann Coulter had actually used the "F" word in reference to the aforementioned would-be Democratic presidential nominee. He then proceeded to ask the Mrs. in-law what said "F" word meant. She proceeded to look said "F" word up in the dictionary.

We were all delighted to find out that:

• A "Fagot" can be any peice of burning wood.


• It can refer to any peice or bundle of wood "intended" for burning.


• It is sometimes used in reference to a peice or bundle of iron also intended for shaping in the fire.


• It is at times used as a slang synonym for a lit cigarette.


• However - you have to add another "G" to it (in their older dictionary) in order to arrive at Ms. Coulters' intended definition.

Needless to say, my wife and I had a very entertaining few minutes bringing her parents up to speed with present day political in-correctness.

Ah, to be their age and innocent again!


Footnotes and other "addenda"

No, of course I don't think it's o.k. to call anybody a fxxxot or anything else you have to censor or substitute letters for (unless of course you know your audience, it's funny, and..... oh, nevermind, just ask Michael Richards how well that works out....) Also, please see me personally if you would like to have a serious, straightforward honest discussion about the gay lifestyle - i'd be a fool to publish my views in this type of forum - I might get creamed from both sides.