This one has been cooking for awhile, so look out!
The other night (a couple of weeks ago, during my latest spree of self-inflicted, painful busyness) me and Beth were sitting back musing. Let me 'splain. Some people "chat", others "share" - not us, we "muse" about stuff. This particular evening our musings took on the usual philosophical tone and I had a (rare) moment of lucidity. Bingo! By way of background, may I add that I am little more than a casual observer of human behavior - most things take me by complete surprise - however, lately I have been frustrated with the state of the world in general. The main case in point - it is no longer right to be right. That was the brilliant thought about which we mused that evening. In our world today - you can no longer be "right" about anything. Everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) is subjective.
This leads me to think... is it o.k. to be wrong? It must be. If I am wrong, you don't dare tell me I'm wrong - you don't have the right to do so. (So long as there is no current law against what I am "wrong" about).
This led to an even further digression. If
(big If) there is no moral standard - no definite "right" any more (I disagree), then we (subjectively) can determine our own path and our own moral standards. This is exactly where we are in society - those in the know call it "Post-modernism" - which is arguably very difficult to clearly define. (If you are still with me, I'll be shocked).
The larger topic of moral absolutes (and their basic proofs) is deep fodder wich I will probably never ever get to and if I should, it will be on my other blog -
http://theologylite.blogspot.com/ 
The sign of our times is currently a guy (or gal) with their hands out in a "back-off" gesture - as if to say, "Hey, stay out of my space." We often hear the phrase - "If it works for you, great!" and "Whatever gets you through the day." Many of my friends now refuse to discuss "religion & politics" in mixed company for fear of being labeled "intolerant" or worse yet "closed-minded."
This is where things get interesting. If it is "wrong" to be "right" about something - or if believing that you are in fact "right" about something - specifically your core moral beliefs - your faith for instance - you believe deep in your soul that this is the truth - if being "right" makes you "wrong" because other people disagree, isn't it "wrong" for them to tell you that you are "wrong" for believing that you are "right" about your beliefs??????? Aren't they being equally closed-minded? That would be wrong wouldn't it?
Well, you don't dare tell them that they are "wrong" to say that you are "wrong" for believing you are "right" - that would be "wrong!"